LAW LIBRARY

Search

ARCHIVE

The City of Johannesburg’s 2018 Supplementary 2 General Valuation Roll

By Chantelle Gladwin-Wood, Partner, Maike Gohl, Partner and Lauren Squier, Associate 23 October 2020 Introduction The City of Johannesburg’s (“COJ”) 2018 Supplementary 2 Valuation Roll (“2018 Supplementary 2 GV”) was released for public inspection and comment on 21 October 2020. It will remain open for inspection and objection until 4 December 2020 It is avialable
Read more
No Comments

Standard Bank of South Africa Limited v Matse; In Re: Standard Bank of South Africa Limited v Matse (19/41390) [2020] ZAGPJHC 221 (11 September 2020)

Case summary written by Sean Buskin and checked by Danmari Duguid 22 October 2020 Background In this matter, the Standard Bank of South Africa Limited (“the Applicant”) launched an application in terms of Rule 4(2) of the Uniform Rules of Court, requesting substituted service of a notice in terms of section 129(1)(a) of the National
Read more
No Comments

DEBT COLLECTION FOR BEGINNERS

By Lisa Schmidt (Associate), Kirsten Chetty (Associate) andWade Jacobs (Candidate Attorney) Taking legal action: initiating process Recovering outstanding amounts can be done effectively through various debt collection mechanisms. Drafting and dispatching a letter of demand has become a prerequisite to any debt collection proceeding. A letter of demand not only sets out the basis of
Read more
No Comments

Denby v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (27338/2017) [2020] ZAGPJHC 213 (9 September 2020)

Case summary written by Dean Scher and checked Ayanda Katjitae 13 October 2020 Background The focus of the judgment is whether the Court has jurisdiction to make an order based upon the agreement of the parties’ legal representatives, where one of the parties had not agreed to the order. Mr Mark Gary Denby, (“the Plaintiff”)
Read more
No Comments

Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering Co, Ltd & Anor v F Whale Corporation TMT Co, Ltd [2020] EWHC 1792 (Comm) (09 July 2020)

Case summary written by Angela Paschalides and checked by Michal Asoulin and Charlotte Clarke 20 October 2020 Background The High Court of Justice of England and Wales (Commercial Court, Queen’s Bench Division) (the “Court”) heard a case wherein pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 39.3 (“CPR 39.3”), F Whale Corporation (the “First Defendant”) and TMT Co,
Read more
No Comments
Facebook X-twitter Linkedin
© 2024 Schindlers Attorneys  | Use of this website is subject to our disclaimer | Powered by Schindlers Attorneys.
Privacy Terms
Disclaimer
IMPORTANT: We are not affiliated with hbgschindlers attorneys
×
YOU`RE CONSULTING WITH:

While our virtual consult offers quick and expert advice, we understand the value of you receiving guidance you can rely on, and the value of human interaction, especially when it comes to your legal needs. If you are looking for guidance you can rely on, or more detailed guidance or wish to discuss your situation in depth, schedule a meeting with one of our experienced attorneys today. Let us provide you with the personalized support and reassurance only a human touch can offer.