LAW LIBRARY

Search

ARCHIVE

What Counts as a “Dispute” with a Municipality?

Introduction This is part 1 of an “idiots guide” to logging queries, disputes and complaints with the City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality (“COJ”). Although one might question why it is necessary to write an article explaining what appears to be such a simple concept, we regularly receive reports of customers not being able to take
Read more
No Comments

HUUR GAAT VOOR KOOP

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this article is to examine the maxim “huur gaat voor koop” that applies in South African Law. MEANING OF THE MAXIM Loosely translated it means that an existing lease trumps a later sale. This means that in the case of a lease of immovable property, a tenant is protected against the
Read more
No Comments

Vincorp (Pty) Ltd v Trust Hungary ZRT (0612017) [2018] ZASCA 35 (27 March 2018)

INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND This matter deals with whether there were a series of agreements for the sale of wine barrels between the parties namely, Vincorp (Pty) Ltd (“the Appellant”) and a Hungarian company, Trust Hungary ZRT (“the Respondent”). In particular, whether there existed the requisite animus contrahendi in respect of both parties. The Respondent, alleging
Read more
No Comments

M v MEC for Health Limpopo (1659/2017) [2018] ZALMPPHC 56 (12 September 2018)

SUMMARY The plaintiff issued summons against the defendant claiming R1,100,000.00 for alleged professional negligence by various hospitals’ doctors and nurses that treated the plaintiff. The defendant raised an exception, and the plaintiff amended her pleadings. The defendant raised a second exception on the basis that the plaintiff’s amended particulars failed to rectify the complaint, are
Read more
No Comments

Motala v the Master (313/13) [2013] ZASCA 185 (29 November 2013)

SUMMARY During July 2003, the first appellant, Motala, being one of the joint liquidators of Cement Board Industries (Pty) Ltd (“CBI”), instituted an action, along with his colleagues and fellow joint liquidators, against the fifth respondent, Boake Incorporated (“Boake”), and the sixth respondent, Mr Kevin Wiles (“Wiles”). The action was still ongoing in August 2010
Read more
No Comments
Facebook X-twitter Linkedin
© 2024 Schindlers Attorneys  | Use of this website is subject to our disclaimer | Powered by Schindlers Attorneys.
Privacy Terms
Disclaimer
IMPORTANT: We are not affiliated with hbgschindlers attorneys
×
YOU`RE CONSULTING WITH:

While our virtual consult offers quick and expert advice, we understand the value of you receiving guidance you can rely on, and the value of human interaction, especially when it comes to your legal needs. If you are looking for guidance you can rely on, or more detailed guidance or wish to discuss your situation in depth, schedule a meeting with one of our experienced attorneys today. Let us provide you with the personalized support and reassurance only a human touch can offer.

MichelaFerreira

Michela Ferreira

Michela plays an integral role in bringing together technology initiatives. Whilst she possesses a strong knowledge of brand development, strategy implementation, consistency and standards, she is proficient in design, multimedia, frontend and backend UI and UX design, frontend design and the formulation of strategies to synthesize the physical and cyber.

She is passionate about modern culture and how technology transforms internal and external business systems to enhance efficiency and growth. 

She is steadfast in her commitment to reshaping the technology landscape into an inclusive domain, ensuring equal access to the burgeoning global digital economy for all individuals. Her efforts focus on democratizing the financial sector, bridging the gap between technology and everyday users worldwide.