BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY Heatherview Estate Extension 24 Home Owners Association (NPC) (the “Applicant”) brought an urgent application before the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria (the “Court”) seeking relief against the Respondents in the matter, being a group of 56 displeased members of the Applicant. The relief sought by the Applicant, included inter
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY Shane Symons and Johanna Symons (“the Plaintiffs”) are the trustees of the Symon Family Trust (“the Trust”), who sought to claim damages against the Rob Roy Investments CC t/a Assetsure (“the Defendant”), the Plaintiffs former financial adviser and investment broker. The Plaintiffs’ claim is based on the premise that the Trust, acting
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY The Supreme Court of Appeal (“the SCA”) recently dismissed an appeal brought by NPGS Protection and Security Services CC (“the First Appellant”) and Mr. Llwellyn Rwaxa (“the Second Appellant”), herein after collectively referred to as “the Appellants” against a judgment of the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg (“the
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY The Plaintiffs in the matter, Mr. and Mrs. van der Bijl, brought an action for damages against the Defendants, Featherbrooke Estate Home Owners’ Association NPC (“the Association”) and Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd (“Fidelity”), the security company employed by the Association to safeguard and protect the estate and its residents.   The
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY The High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Local Division (the “Court”) handed down judgment dismissing an application with costs made by the Applicant as material disputes of fact arose between the parties, and which could not be resolved on the papers alone.     The Respondent is an attorney and conveyancer and
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (the “CCMA”) recently handed down judgment in terms of a section 191(5)(a)(i) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (the “Act”). The question of law before the Arbitrator of the Court was whether or not the dismissal of the Applicants was substantively fair.  
SUMMARY The Supreme Court of Appeal (the “SCA”) recently set aside a decision of the Tax Court of South Africa, held in Gauteng (the “Tax Court”), in terms of which the Tax Court increased understatement penalties levied by the South African Revenue Services (“SARS”). Purlish Holdings (Pty) Ltd (the “Appellant”), having paid provisional tax to